What's After the Blog?

Opinions

Flight Risk (2025): Does It Soar or Stall?

Sharing opinions on Flight Risk's narrative execution, character development, and overall impact on audiences.

January 24, 2025

Flight Risk (2025): Does It Soar or Stall?

Movies mentioned in this article


Flight Risk (2025): Does It Soar or Stall?

Few recent movies have provoked as many mixed reactions as Flight Risk (2025), a contained thriller directed by Mel Gibson and starring Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Dockery, and Topher Grace. The film is a high-tension story that takes place almost entirely inside a small prop plane soaring over the snowy Alaskan wilderness. Some viewers find the premise exciting, while others argue that the film never fully takes flight.

If you’re looking for a one-stop hub for all your “Flight Risk” needs, check out What’s After the Movie. Our site offers movie summaries, fun quizzes, additional opinions, and links to outside resources like Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, and IMDb—so you can see how other moviegoers and critics feel. We also regularly share blog posts (including this one!) at What’s After the Movie’s official blog.

For those who can’t get enough of “Flight Risk” details, be sure to visit our dedicated page on the movie:
Flight Risk (2025).


A Quick Overview of the Plot

Flight Risk follows Madolyn (Michelle Dockery), a U.S. Air Marshal tasked with escorting Winston (Topher Grace) to testify against powerful mob connections. Their ride to Anchorage is a rickety propeller plane flown by Daryl (Mark Wahlberg)—who might be more than just your run-of-the-mill pilot. What unfolds is a high-stakes, 90-minute, close-quarters battle of wits and fists. Mistrust escalates by the minute, revealing that everyone on board has a few secrets.

From a conceptual standpoint, the film promises seat-gripping tension: three people trapped in a plane, braving the icy Alaskan skies, each with personal stakes that mount by the second. The potential for suspense is tremendous—but whether the film delivers on that tension is a subject of ongoing debate.


Cast and Characters

  1. Mark Wahlberg as Daryl

    • A seemingly charming, folksy pilot who soon reveals a brutal streak. His transitions from casual chatter to ruthless threats can be jarring, though for some, that shift is exactly what makes the film entertaining.
  2. Michelle Dockery as Madolyn

    • The dedicated Air Marshal juggling the mission of keeping Winston alive and discovering who in her organization might be selling out her flight plan. She’s serious, fiercely protective, and forced into last-minute heroics.
  3. Topher Grace as Winston

    • A bespectacled fugitive-turned-informant whose reasons for turning state’s evidence aren’t entirely clear at first. He oscillates between panicked passenger and sarcastic wisecracker, sometimes providing comic relief in a tension-filled scenario.

The focus on these three characters (and their separate motivations) is both the film’s greatest strength—there’s nowhere to run on a plane—and a source of frustration when poorly written dialogue or tonal inconsistencies creep in.


A Constrained Setting: Claustrophobia or Creative Genius?

One major talking point is the near-single-location setup. Some moviegoers praise the claustrophobic atmosphere, likening it to classic contained thrillers like Speed or Phone Booth—except, of course, this one involves a tiny plane high above the Alaskan mountains. Others feel the limited environment never quite morphs into the pressure cooker it promises to be.

On the upside:

  • Heightened Tension: Watching characters navigate cramped quarters can heighten paranoia.
  • Focused Performances: With so few places to go, each actor is forced to bring their A-game (or risk the entire production stalling).
  • Opportunity for Innovation: Constrained settings can encourage clever camera work, dynamic blocking, and well-paced storytelling.

On the downside:

  • Repetitive Scenes: Many sequences boil down to scuffles in the cockpit or the plane’s cramped aisle.
  • Tonal Shifts: The film can’t decide if it’s a gritty psychological thriller or a borderline cartoonish action flick. Some viewers find this jarring, especially when comedic lines pop up in the midst of darker content.

The Highs and Lows of Mel Gibson’s Direction

Mel Gibson’s Legacy

Mel Gibson is no stranger to high-intensity narratives. His directorial portfolio includes Braveheart, The Passion of the Christ, Apocalypto, and Hacksaw Ridge—each known for powerful visuals and intense sequences.

Does Flight Risk Stand Out?

  • Strengths

    • Gibson’s knack for brutality is evident in a few surprisingly raw fight scenes.
    • Some aerial shots over the Alaskan wilderness are genuinely striking, capturing the haunting beauty of the setting.
  • Weaknesses

    • Critics cite “sloppy direction” for the film’s tonal inconsistencies.
    • The limited setting does not appear to spark Gibson’s full creativity; some sequences feel underwhelming or repetitive.
    • The script, penned by Jared Rosenberg, is often called “inept trash” by harsher critics. While that might be extreme, the dialogue does dip into questionable territory more than once, undermining the potential tension.

Audience and Critical Reactions

Opinion on Flight Risk (2025) is notably divided. Here’s a quick look at how the film is faring on popular platforms:

  • Metacritic: A mix of middling reviews. Critics are unimpressed, but a few user scores are on the positive side, mainly citing Mark Wahlberg’s unhinged performance as entertaining.
  • Rotten Tomatoes: The current consensus notes “potential for a tight thriller, yet hobbled by messy direction.” Audience ratings hover around the mid-range.
  • IMDb: Early user ratings are mixed, with some praising the stripped-down tension while others find the script lazy.
  • TMDB: Provides a general overview, including cast and crew info, plus user reviews that vary from “underrated gem” to “painful watch.”
  • Wikipedia: A quick resource for release information, production details, and behind-the-scenes facts.
  • JustWatch: Handy for checking where the film is streaming and comparing options.
  • Box Office Mojo: Box office numbers are rolling in but appear modest—no runaway success, but not a total flop, either.
  • Letterboxd: Early reviews from the film community are largely negative, but there’s a cult following praising the movie’s unintentional comedy.
  • Movie Insider: Offers production updates and indicates that marketing for the film has been more subdued than typical big-studio thrillers.

What’s the Online Buzz?

Social media chatter reveals a divided audience. Casual movie fans often enjoy the outlandish set pieces and Mark Wahlberg’s unusual, highly animated performance. More discerning cinephiles, however, appear frustrated by plot holes, odd comedic beats, and stilted dialogue. On Reddit, discussion threads debate whether “Flight Risk” is so-bad-it’s-good or simply a missed opportunity.


Where to Get More Information

If you want to dive deeper into Flight Risk and compare your opinions with other reviews:

  • What’s After the Movie: Our official site hosts a dedicated page for “Flight Risk (2025)” (right here) featuring a detailed summary, movie quizzes (test how much you really know about those chaotic plane scenes), and links to other information providers.
  • What’s After the Movie Blog: For more articles, in-depth discussions, and themed posts about upcoming films, behind-the-scenes trivia, and spoiler-heavy analyses (you’ve been warned!).

Final Opinion: Is It Worth the Flight?

Flight Risk (2025) is undeniably an odd beast. On one hand, it’s an unabashed throwback to the simpler “three characters in peril” setup—think Die Hard on a plane minus the large cast. The film can be a guilty pleasure for those who appreciate enclosed-space thrillers, Mark Wahlberg’s hammy villainy, or the novelty of Michelle Dockery playing a more action-oriented role.

On the other hand, sloppy dialogue, occasional tonal whiplash, and a sometimes visibly bored directorial style could leave you disappointed if you expect a masterpiece from Mel Gibson (especially given his critically lauded past films). For many, the comedic lines undercut the tension. For others, the silliness is the film’s highlight—providing entertainment precisely because it’s so over-the-top.

My Take

If you’re a movie buff who can enjoy campy dialogue, questionable choices, and over-the-top violence in an enclosed setting, you might find Flight Risk ironically fun. If you’re looking for a taut thriller with impeccable writing and carefully handled suspense, you may want to lower your expectations—or skip this flight altogether.

Either way, I encourage you to join the discussion and share your thoughts. Head over to What’s After the Movie for quizzes, expanded info, and more reviews. Because once the film ends (or the plane lands!), you might still have questions—and we have answers! Happy watching, and may your next plane ride be infinitely less eventful.


© 2025 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.