Downfall: The Case Against Boeing

Downfall: The Case Against Boeing 2022

Directed by

Rory Kennedy

Rory Kennedy

Made by

Netflix

Netflix

Test your knowledge of Downfall: The Case Against Boeing with our quiz!

Plot Summary

Discover the intricate plot of Downfall: The Case Against Boeing (2022). From unexpected twists to emotional highs and lows, this detailed summary breaks down every moment to give you a deeper understanding of the film’s story.


The film delves into the devastating incidents involving the Boeing 737 MAX in 2019, which led to the tragic crashes of two airliners and the loss of 346 lives. At the core of the narrative is a critical examination of whether Boeing prioritized financial profits over the safety of its passengers and the company’s longstanding reputation for quality and safety.

As Kennedy articulated about Boeing’s journey into the 21st century, > “There were many decades when Boeing did extraordinary things by focusing on excellence and safety and ingenuity. Those three virtues were seen as the key to profit.” However, this focus began to shift when the company was taken over by leaders who viewed Wall Street as the ultimate objective, rather than balancing profit with public welfare.

The story follows the events from October 19, 2018, when LionAir Flight 610 tragically plummeted shortly after takeoff in Jakarta, Indonesia. The Boeing 737 MAX, newly introduced yet untested, was thought to be in normal ascent; however, faulty sensor readings caused the aircraft to lose control, crashing and claiming 189 lives. Initially, Boeing deflected blame onto the Indonesian air safety standards, LionAir, and pilot errors, never acknowledging the possibility of a flaw in their aircraft design.

As recovery efforts continued, black box findings revealed that a defective angle of attack sensor had triggered erroneous readings, leading to repeated nose-down commands from the plane’s Maneuver Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS). Despite the mounting evidence, Dennis Muilenburg, then Chairman of Boeing, maintained a public facade of safety, downplaying the system’s role.

In November, Boeing released a statement about the erroneous MCAS activation, a term that had been previously unknown to many, including the pilots of Lion Air. Critics, including journalist Andy Pasztor from the Wall Street Journal, contended that Boeing withheld vital information regarding the MCAS from pilot unions, igniting a firestorm within the aviation community. Following the LionAir crash, Boeing began to brief pilot unions about the system’s implications, while simultaneously reassuring the public of the 737 MAX’s safety.

Then, on March 10, 2019, tragedy struck again as Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 met a similar fate, killing 157 individuals. This time, investigators discovered almost identical patterns to the LionAir incident. The swift grounding of the aircraft by Trump and subsequent congressional investigations highlighted the growing concern regarding pilot training and design flaws within Boeing’s operations.

For years, Boeing had been celebrated as a titan in the aviation industry, known for its innovations such as the Boeing 707 and 747; however, a shift toward prioritizing profit led to diminished safety protocols. The pivotal merger with McDonnell Douglas in 1996 under Harry Stonecipher brought about a culture where cutting costs took precedence over engineering excellence.

As production pressures intensified, a reduction in quality staff and resources became apparent. By the time the 737 MAX was introduced, the plants were primarily focused on rapid output, hampering Boeing’s commitment to safety and quality. With Airbus gaining ground in the market and the A320 NEO launching successfully, Boeing sought to modify the aging 737 design by adding new fuel-efficient engines without inciting the need for retraining pilots. However, this plan led to a reliance on a single sensor for critical flight operations—an oversight that would later prove catastrophic.

In a series of congressional hearings, it became evident that Boeing was aware of the potential risks yet chose to pursue profit over rigorous safety protocols. The fallout from the investigations resulted in Boeing facing severe financial penalties, leading to a corporate re-evaluation. Ultimately, the MCAS system was redesigned, and the grounded fleet recommenced operations in November 2020.

Boeing’s journey through these crises shines a light on the critical importance of safety in aviation, the devastating outcomes of neglecting this principle, and raises questions about corporate responsibility and ethics in high-stakes industries.

Timeline

Track the key events of Downfall: The Case Against Boeing (2022) with a comprehensive timeline. Perfect for understanding the sequence of major plot points, this feature offers clarity on how the story unfolds.


Boeing 737 MAX Introduction

In the early stages of the 21st century, Boeing introduced the 737 MAX, aiming to compete with Airbus's A320 NEO. This move was seen as an effort to adapt an aging design while minimizing retraining needs for pilots, but it set the stage for future tragedies.

LionAir Flight 610 Crash

On October 19, 2018, LionAir Flight 610 tragically crashed shortly after takeoff from Jakarta, Indonesia, resulting in the loss of 189 lives. The aircraft, equipped with the new Boeing 737 MAX, experienced a loss of control due to faulty sensor readings, leading to the disaster.

October 19, 2018 Jakarta, Indonesia

Initial Blame by Boeing

Following the LionAir crash, Boeing's leadership quickly deflected blame towards Indonesian air safety standards and pilot errors. This refusal to acknowledge possible design flaws in the 737 MAX raised significant concerns about the company's accountability.

Black Box Recovery Findings

As recovery efforts continued post-LionAir crash, investigators retrieved the black boxes, revealing that a defective angle of attack sensor triggered erroneous readings. This malfunction led to automated systems issuing repeated nose-down commands, contributing to the crash.

Boeing's Public Response

Despite the mounting evidence from the LionAir incident, then-Chairman Dennis Muilenburg publicly downplayed the role of the MCAS system in the crash. This response sparked further scrutiny from the aviation community as reports of the MCAS's dangers began to circulate.

Release of MCAS Information

In November 2018, Boeing released a statement acknowledging the erroneous MCAS activation, a term previously unknown to many pilots. Critics, including journalist Andy Pasztor, argued that Boeing had withheld critical safety information from pilot unions during this time.

November 2018

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 Crash

On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 suffered a catastrophic crash, killing all 157 passengers on board. Investigators noted alarming similarities between this incident and the LionAir crash, reigniting concerns about the 737 MAX's safety.

March 10, 2019

Grounding of the 737 MAX

Following the Ethiopian Airlines crash, the U.S. government swiftly grounded the entire fleet of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. This decision came after a growing chorus of public and political concerns regarding the plane’s safety and the emerging details of its design flaws.

Congressional Investigations Begin

As the investigation into the Ethiopian Airlines crash unfolded, Congress initiated hearings focusing on Boeing's safety protocols and pilot training. These investigations revealed potential negligence on Boeing's part when it came to maintaining safety standards and corporate ethics.

Boeing's Corporate Culture Revealed

The congressional hearings demonstrated a significant shift in Boeing's corporate culture, prioritizing profits over safety. Testimonies indicated that after the 1996 merger with McDonnell Douglas, there was a notable decrease in quality and emphasis on engineering excellence.

Operational Changes at Boeing

As production demands increased, Boeing reduced its quality staff, impacting safety protocols. This rapid output pressure resulted in a culture where the priority shifted from safety and quality to meeting economic objectives.

Design Flaw Acknowledgement

In a sobering acknowledgment of the crisis, it was revealed that Boeing was aware of the risks associated with the MCAS system yet continued to move ahead without addressing these issues adequately. The implications of this decision would have devastating effects on the aviation industry.

Financial Penalties and Re-evaluation

The fallout from the incidents required Boeing to face significant financial penalties and a comprehensive corporate re-evaluation. This scrutiny prompted a re-assessment of safety protocols that had been neglected in favor of profits.

MCAS System Redesign

In response to the crisis and subsequent investigations, Boeing committed to redesigning the MCAS system. This redesign aimed to enhance the safety of the 737 MAX and restore public confidence in the aircraft, ensuring better operational guidelines for pilots.

737 MAX Returns to Service

After extensive scrutiny and modifications, the Boeing 737 MAX was cleared to return to service in November 2020. This marked a critical moment for Boeing as it sought to rebuild its reputation and strengthen its commitment to passenger safety.

November 2020

Setting

Uncover the settings of Downfall: The Case Against Boeing (2022), from iconic locations to the time period that shapes its world. See how these elements add depth and context to the movie’s narrative.


Time period

October 2018 - March 2019

This period marked a significant crisis in aviation history, specifically related to the Boeing 737 MAX incidents. It was a time of heightened scrutiny regarding aircraft safety, corporate responsibility, and the balance between profit and public welfare. The events during this time led to global repercussions in regulatory practices and design protocols in the aviation industry.

Location

Jakarta, Indonesia

Jakarta, the bustling capital of Indonesia, is known for its vibrant culture, historical landmarks, and dense population. The city plays a significant role in aviation as it houses Soekarno-Hatta International Airport, a vital hub for both domestic and international flights. Its prominence as an aviation center makes it critical in the context of aviation safety.

🌍 Location ✈️ Aviation

Themes

Explore the core themes of Downfall: The Case Against Boeing (2022). From its commentary on social issues to its emotional undertones, delve into the deeper messages woven into the film’s story.


💼

Corporate Ethics

The film emphasizes the theme of corporate ethics, showcasing how the pursuit of profit can overshadow fundamental safety practices. It examines Boeing's decisions that ultimately led to catastrophic consequences and raises important questions about the responsibility corporations hold towards their customers. The narrative serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of compromising safety for financial gain.

✈️

Aviation Safety

Aviation safety is a central theme in the movie, highlighting the devastating impact when safety protocols are neglected. The film explores the consequences of faulty designs and inadequate training, underscoring the importance of rigorous safety standards in aviation. This theme resonates deeply, as it reflects the lives lost and the trust broken in a once-esteemed industry.

© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.