Directed by
Justine Triet
Made by
Les Films Pelléas
In a secluded mountain retreat near Grenoble, novelist Sandra Voyter finds herself amidst turmoil when she initially cancels an interview with a young student, disturbed by the loud music emanating from the attic, courtesy of her husband Samuel Maleski. After the student departs, Sandra’s visually impaired son Daniel ventures outside with his loyal guide dog, Snoop. Their return takes a tragic turn when they discover Samuel lying motionless on the ground, seemingly the victim of an accidental fall.
As the investigation unfolds, Daniel’s conflicting accounts about the circumstances surrounding his father’s demise, coupled with the grim fact that Samuel had suffered a head injury prior to his fall, raise immediate suspicions. The emergence of an audio recording capturing a heated dispute between Sandra and Samuel exacerbates the situation, leading to Sandra’s indictment on charges of homicide. This development prompts an intense scrutiny of their tumultuous relationship.
During the gripping trial, Sandra’s defense asserts that Samuel fell from the attic window, receiving fatal injuries upon impact with the shed below. In stark contrast, the prosecution contends that Sandra was responsible for Samuel’s death, suggesting she delivered a deadly blow and pushed him from their second-floor balcony. As the courtroom tension escalates, Sandra confronts her husband’s psychiatrist, questioning his shared responsibility for Daniel’s visual impairment, which originated from an accident under Samuel’s watch.
The audio recording reveals a chilling glimpse into their volatile relationship, with Samuel hurling accusations of plagiarism, infidelity, and emotional manipulation at Sandra. These revelations illustrate that their problems went far beyond a single event; the prosecution boldly claims that the recorded violence stems solely from Sandra, while Sandra counters, asserting that her husband equally instigated the physical confrontation.
Adding to the tension, the prosecution introduces allegations regarding Sandra’s extramarital affair from a year earlier, insinuating that Samuel’s loud music was a reflection of his jealousy. They further argue that Sandra’s tendency to incorporate personal struggles into her writing draws unsettling parallels between the murder of her husband and the thoughts of a character in her latest novel.
Defiantly, Sandra argues that one audio recording does not encapsulate the true fabric of their relationship, nor do the musings of a fictional character mirror her own reality. As the trial surges toward its climax, Sandra’s fate hangs delicately in the balance, leaving audiences to ponder the intricate boundary between reality and fiction.
As Daniel’s emotional turbulence reaches a critical point, he resolves to take the stand before the jury makes its verdict known. Aware of the potential for external influences, the judge imposes strict guidelines to assure the integrity of Daniel’s testimony, appointing Marge Berger to oversee the proceedings. In a bold act, Daniel requests that Sandra vacate their home for the weekend, opting instead for solitude with Marge and Snoop, in an effort to process his profound emotions. His memories of Samuel’s tragic overdose, compounded by Snoop’s sickness—possibly triggered by consuming his vomit—serve as haunting reminders of the unrelenting despair that can accompany pain.
As Daniel confides deeply in Marge, she poignantly suggests that if he struggles to untangle the truth, he should instead focus on what resonates as truth for him personally. This profound realization paves the way for Daniel’s moving appearance on the witness stand, where he openly shares his belief in his father’s potential suicide, ultimately rejecting the possibility of murder.
Daniel reminisces about a somber conversation with Samuel that occurred while they transported Snoop to the veterinarian. He recalls how his father’s words appeared to foreshadow his own mortality, an implication that sheds new light on the tragic circumstances of his death. Ultimately, Sandra’s acquittal depends heavily on Daniel’s heartrending testimony.
As the emotional upheaval begins to settle, Daniel and Sandra share a tender reunion, revealing their fears and hopes. They embrace in a profound moment of understanding, confronting the weight of their shared loss. Later, as night falls, Sandra seeks solace in bed, her gaze lingering on a cherished photograph of herself with Samuel. Meanwhile, Snoop curls up beside her, symbolizing the indelible bonds that continue to exist even beyond death.
Initial Turmoil
In a secluded mountain retreat near Grenoble, novelist Sandra Voyter experiences chaos as she cancels an interview with a young student. The loud music coming from the attic, courtesy of her husband Samuel Maleski, adds to her distress.
Tragic Discovery
After the student leaves, Sandra's visually impaired son, Daniel, and his guide dog, Snoop, venture outside. They return to find Samuel lying on the ground, seemingly the victim of an accidental fall, which marks the beginning of the investigation.
Investigation Begins
As investigators delve into the circumstances of Samuel's death, they note Daniel's conflicting accounts. Samuel's head injury prior to the fall raises suspicions about the nature of the incident.
Audio Evidence Emerges
An audio recording of a heated dispute between Sandra and Samuel surfaces, revealing the tensions in their relationship. This evidence complicates matters further, leading to Sandra's indictment for homicide.
The Trial Commences
During the trial, Sandra's defense argues that Samuel fell accidentally from the attic window. In contrast, the prosecution claims Sandra pushed him, introducing the audio recording as a key piece of evidence.
Accusations Intensify
The courtroom witnesses heated debates as Sandra confronts her husband’s psychiatrist about his involvement in their son's visual impairment. Both sides present their views on the implications of this tragic accident.
Personal Struggles Revealed
The prosecution highlights Sandra’s past extramarital affair, suggesting Samuel's loud music was born out of jealousy. This revelation underscores the psychological complexities of their rocky relationship.
Sandra's Defense Stands Firm
In a powerful rebuttal, Sandra contends that one audio recording cannot define the entirety of their relationship. She emphasizes that her writing is not a reflection of her reality, but rather a creative expression.
Daniel's Emotional Journey
As Daniel grapples with his feelings of loss, he decides to take the stand in the trial. The judge places strict guidelines for his testimony, ensuring its integrity during this pivotal moment.
Solitude and Reflection
Upon requesting solitude, Daniel chooses to spend time with Marge and Snoop for the weekend, seeking space to process his grief. He recalls traumatic memories intertwined with the recent events surrounding Samuel's overdose.
Truth and Testimony
During his testimony, Daniel shockingly reveals his belief that Samuel may have committed suicide. He expresses a profound rejection of the idea of murder, which marks a turning point in the trial.
Recollections of the Past
Daniel reflects on a poignant conversation with Samuel about mortality that occurred while they took Snoop to the vet. This moment adds depth to the understanding of Samuel's tragic end.
Emotional Reunion
After the trial, Daniel and Sandra share a heartfelt reunion, expressing their fears and hopes amid their shared grief. Their embrace signifies a moment of healing and understanding.
Searching for Solace
As night falls, Sandra seeks comfort in bed, reflecting on a cherished photograph of herself with Samuel. This moment symbolizes her ongoing connection to her late husband despite his absence.
The Unbreakable Bond
Snoop curls up beside Sandra in bed, representing the enduring ties of love and memory that continue to exist following death. This scene illustrates the profound impact of loss and the bonds that remain.
Sandra Voyter (Sandra Hüller)
Sandra is a complex character, navigating the implications of her husband's sudden death while being scrutinized for potential foul play. Beneath her exterior lies a tumult of emotions, driven by love, grief, and the fight for her vindication.
Daniel (Milo Machado Graner)
Daniel is Sandra and Samuel's visually impaired son, who becomes a pivotal figure in the trial. His emotional conflict and insights into his father's struggles lead to critical revelations that challenge the narrative of the case.
Marge Berger (Jehnny Beth)
Marge serves as a supportive figure for Daniel, nurturing him through his emotional turmoil. Her gentle guidance helps him articulate his true feelings, ultimately shaping the outcome of the trial.
Time period
The time period of the movie is contemporary, reflecting modern societal issues and personal conflicts. It showcases current legal practices, familial relationships, and psychological challenges faced by individuals today.
Location
Secluded mountain retreat, Grenoble
The movie takes place in a secluded mountain retreat near Grenoble, known for its breathtaking views and tranquil isolation. This serene setting contrasts sharply with the emotional turmoil experienced by the characters, making it a pivotal backdrop for the unfolding drama.
⚖️
Justice
The theme of justice is central to the movie as Sandra faces grave allegations following her husband's death. The courtroom drama explores the quest for truth and the complexities of legal proceedings, highlighting how personal relationships intertwine with societal judgment.
💔
Relationships
A deep exploration of tumultuous relationships is portrayed through Sandra and Samuel's marriage. Their conflicts are laid bare, revealing issues of trust, jealousy, and emotional manipulation that play a significant role in the tragic events that unfold.
🧠
Mental Health
The film delves into themes of mental health, particularly through the character of Daniel and his struggles with understanding his father's death. It also critiques the influence of mental health professionals on familial dynamics and the perceptions of personal responsibility.
What's After the Movie?
Not sure whether to stay after the credits? Find out!
Check out our other apps:
Actors
Companies
Latest Movies
© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.