Directed by
Armando Iannucci
Made by
IFC Films
When both the UK and the US are advocating for military action in the Middle East, Simon Foster (Tom Hollander), the Minister for International Development and MP for Northampton, inadvertently declares during a BBC Radio 4 interview that a war is “unforeseeable.” This statement provokes the ire of Malcolm Tucker (Peter Capaldi), the Prime Minister’s Director of Communications, who harshly reprimands Simon and instructs him to adhere to the official line. In a bid to support Simon, Judy Molloy (Gina McKee), the Director of Communications for the UK Department for International Development, steps in, but even she falls prey to Tucker’s fury as he storms out.
As Simon flounders, his new aide, Toby Wright (Chris Addison), with the help of his girlfriend Suzy (Olivia Poulet), manages to get Simon to attend an important Foreign Office meeting. This gathering, orchestrated by Michael Rodgers (James Smith), Director of Diplomacy, features Karen Clark (Mimi Kennedy), the US Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomacy, who is against military intervention. During the meeting, she raises concerns about a report authored by her assistant, Liza Weld (Anna Chlumsky), titled “Post-War Planning, Parameters, Implications and Possibilities” (PWPPIP), which strongly argues against the intervention due to insufficient intelligence sourced from an unverifiable informant known as “Iceman.”
Amidst rising tension, Simon is ambushed by reporters and, attempting to appease them, contradicts himself by stating that the government must be ready to “climb the mountain of conflict,” incurring another rebuke from Tucker. Meanwhile, back in the US, Karen and Liza suspect that Linton Barwick (David Rasche), the US Assistant Secretary of State for Policy, has quietly initiated a secretive war committee. As the plot thickens, Bob Adriano (Enzo Cilenti), an advisor to Linton, informs him that Karen might be onto the clandestine operations. In an effort to manipulate public perceptions, Linton alters meeting minutes to reflect only pro-war sentiments, obscuring any mention of the war committee.
In a twist of fate, Tucker sends Simon on a mission to the US for fact-finding, a decision that leads to Simon dismissing Judy from his team. At a networking event, Karen partners with Lieutenant General George Miller (James Gandolfini), who also opposes military action, and suggests that Simon’s involvement in the conflict discussions could provide a platform for dissent. During their time in Washington, Simon and Toby receive an invitation from Karen to attend a Future Planning committee meeting, but Toby inadvertently shares the details with a CNN contact, initiating a series of unforeseen complications that culminate in a rendezvous with Liza.
Tucker soon arrives in the US, only to discover that Linton has cleverly sidelined him while holding the real war committee meeting at another venue. Due to Toby’s leak, the Future Planning committee faces overwhelming media scrutiny, yet neither Karen nor George manages to obtain substantial information about the impending war. Both turn to Simon, seeking his endorsement for their differing agendas, but he remains noncommittal, struggling to articulate any significant stance.
As tensions flare back in Northampton, Simon’s constituent, Paul Michaelson (Steve Coogan), confronts him regarding a dilapidated office wall threatening to cave into his mother’s garden, prompting negative press coverage around Simon’s perceived negligence. In the face of mounting pressure, Karen demands a scapegoat for the leak about the war committee, leading Simon to suspect that Judy might be the culprit. The turmoil continues when Suzy finds out about Toby’s brief affair with Liza, leading to their breakup and a dramatic fallout.
In a rush to expedite the security council vote on military intervention, the President pressures the situation by vetoing tariffs on Chinese imports, making it clear that he wishes for China to abstain. In a final gambit, Simon instructs Judy to leak that he plans to resign if a pro-war vote occurs. Together with Judy, Toby, and Tucker, he heads to New York City for the UN Security Council vote. However, Tucker learns of the leaked PWPPIP report, which threatens to derail the vote.
Ultimately, it comes to light that the leak stemmed from Michael Rodgers, who unwittingly disclosed sensitive information. As the situation spirals, Tucker, aided by Senior Press Officer Jamie McDonald (Paul Higgins), seizes control by concocting details from the report to present a biased narrative favoring intervention. With this manufactured intelligence at hand, the committee endorses military action.
In the aftermath, George informs Karen of his decision not to resign now that the war is underway. Meanwhile, Simon confronts the reality of his inevitable resignation, but Tucker preemptively dismisses him from the cabinet before Simon can act on his intentions. The chaotic political machinations ultimately lead to the appointment of a new Minister for International Development, signaling the end of Simon’s tumultuous journey.
Simon Foster's Interview
During a BBC Radio 4 interview, Simon Foster accidentally declares that a military intervention in the Middle East is 'unforeseeable.' This unexpected statement incites anger within the government, particularly from Malcolm Tucker, who demands strict adherence to the official stance.
Malcolm Tucker's Fury
Malcolm Tucker, the Prime Minister's Director of Communications, confronts Simon after his blunder during the interview. He delivers a harsh reprimand, insisting that Simon must follow the party line and avoiding any further public missteps.
Judy's Support
In a bid to assist Simon, Judy Molloy steps in as his buffer against Tucker's anger. However, she too falls victim to Tucker's wrath as he storms out of the office, illustrating the high-stakes pressures faced by government officials.
Foreign Office Meeting
Simon, under the guidance of his aide Toby Wright, attends a critical Foreign Office meeting. The meeting, chaired by Michael Rodgers, features discussions led by Karen Clark, who firmly opposes military intervention and presents a strong case against it.
Concerns Over Intelligence
During the meeting, Karen raises red flags regarding a report by her assistant Liza Weld, cautioning that war should not proceed based on flimsy intelligence from an informant known as 'Iceman.' This revelation contributes to the growing tension among the officials.
Simon Contradicts Himself
Amid increasing pressure from reporters, Simon attempts to clarify the government's position but ends up contradicting himself. He mentions the need to 'climb the mountain of conflict,' further inciting Tucker's anger and complicating Simon's standing.
Linton's Secret Committee
In the US, the plot thickens as Karen and Liza suspect Linton Barwick is leading a secret committee to plot military action. The clandestine operations create a backdrop of intrigue and manipulation, raising tensions between UK and US officials.
Simon's Trip to the US
In a strategic move, Tucker orders Simon to the US for fact-finding, a decision that leads him to dismiss Judy from his team. This trip is intended to assert Simon's influence in the ongoing discussions on military action.
Networking Event
At a networking event, Karen connects with Lieutenant General George Miller, who shares her anti-war sentiments. They strategize on how Simon's participation in conflict discussions might foster dissent against military intervention.
The Leak Happens
Toby inadvertently leaks information about a Future Planning committee meeting, causing a stir and complicating Simon's intentions. This misstep attracts media attention and places pressure on all involved parties.
Media Scrutiny
As a result of Toby's leak, the Future Planning committee faces intense media scrutiny. Despite this, neither Karen nor George can gather relevant information about the impending war, putting Simon in a challenging position.
Paul's Complaint
Back in Northampton, Simon's constituent Paul Michaelson confronts him over a crumbling office wall threatening his mother's garden. This incident results in unfavorable press coverage, contributing to Simon's declining public image.
Pressure for a Scapegoat
Amidst the political chaos, Karen demands to identify a scapegoat for the leak regarding the war committee. Simon suspects Judy could be the source of the leak, leading to increased tensions and paranoia within the ranks.
The UN Security Council Vote
In a final attempt to influence the military intervention decision, Simon instructs Judy to announce his resignation plans if a pro-war vote occurs. The meeting at the UN becomes a pivotal moment for Simon and the future of military action.
Simon’s Inevitable Resignation
As the dust settles, Simon confronts the reality of his impending resignation from the cabinet. However, Tucker, seizing control, preemptively dismisses Simon, marking a dramatic end to his tumultuous journey in the government.
Simon Foster (Tom Hollander)
Simon Foster is depicted as a well-meaning but bumbling Minister for International Development who inadvertently stirs political chaos with his offhand remarks. He struggles to maintain his position amidst the pressure from higher-ups and the media frenzy surrounding military intervention. His character embodies the conflict between personal beliefs and professional responsibilities.
Malcolm Tucker (Peter Capaldi)
Malcolm Tucker is the ruthless Director of Communications, known for his sharp tongue and aggressive tactics. He represents the unyielding pressure of political machinations, often manipulating situations to maintain control. His character highlights the darker side of politics, where ruthlessness often prevails over ethical considerations.
Karen Clark (Mimi Kennedy)
Karen Clark serves as a voice of reason opposing military intervention, emphasizing the need for careful deliberation and ethics in political decisions. She demonstrates strong convictions and concern for the implications of war, creating a stark contrast to the more aggressive characters in the film. Her character illustrates the complexity of navigating politics while maintaining integrity.
Time period
Contemporary
Set in a contemporary timeframe, the film reflects the political climate of the early 21st century, paralleling real-world issues around military interventions in the Middle East. This period is marked by heightened national security concerns and rising geopolitical tensions, influencing the diplomatic strategies and communications portrayed in the film.
Location
United Kingdom, United States, New York City
The film primarily takes place in the political environments of the United Kingdom and the United States, depicting a mix of government offices and strategic meetings. Notably, New York City serves as the backdrop for the significant UN Security Council vote, showcasing the high stakes of international diplomacy. These locations highlight the contrasts between the decision-making processes of both nations during a time of global tension.
🕊️
War and Diplomacy
The central theme revolves around the complexities of war and diplomacy, illustrating the tensions and conflicts that arise from differing agendas. It explores the manipulation of information and public perception by political figures as they navigate the precarious landscape of military intervention. The film poses critical questions about responsibility, ethics, and the personal costs of such political machinations.
🎭
Political Intrigue
The narrative is steeped in political intrigue, showcasing the behind-the-scenes maneuvers of power players. Characters engage in a web of deception, alliances, and betrayals, revealing the cutthroat nature of political life. This theme highlights how personal ambitions can often clash with national interests, underscoring the fragility of trust in high-stakes environments.
💔
Personal Sacrifice
The theme of personal sacrifice is evident as characters navigate their professional roles at the expense of personal relationships and integrity. Simon's journey illustrates the toll that political pressure can take on individuals, affecting their personal lives and ethical stands. The film conveys the harsh reality that in politics, choices often come with significant personal costs.
What's After the Movie?
Not sure whether to stay after the credits? Find out!
Check out our other apps:
Actors
Companies
Latest Movies
© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.