Test your knowledge of The Fifth Estate with our quiz!

Plot Summary

Discover the intricate plot of The Fifth Estate (2013). From unexpected twists to emotional highs and lows, this detailed summary breaks down every moment to give you a deeper understanding of the film’s story.


The film begins in 2010, shortly after the release of the Afghan War Logs, and takes a step back to 2007, where we witness the initial meeting between journalist Daniel Domscheit-Berg and Australian journalist Julian Assange at the Chaos Communication Congress held in Berlin. Drawn by his passion for online activism, Daniel has corresponded with Assange via email and is eager to collaborate with him on WikiLeaks, a platform dedicated to the disclosure of classified information while ensuring the anonymity of its sources. Their first major endeavor targets the Swiss bank Julius Baer, which has been implicated in illegal activities through its Cayman Islands branch. Even after Baer files a lawsuit and secures an injunction, a judge ultimately lifts the restriction, allowing Daniel and Julian to reclaim the domain name.

As their ambition grows, they diligently advance their agenda and publish a range of sensitive information over the following years, including details about Scientology, the unveiling of Sarah Palin’s email account, and the membership roster of the British National Party (BNP). Initially, Daniel feels a sense of purpose and accomplishment, believing that they are engaging in a noble cause and looking up to Assange as a mentor. However, as time passes, their partnership becomes increasingly strained. Daniel grapples with personal and professional setbacks; he ultimately loses his job and faces complications in his personal relationships, particularly as the BNP leak inadvertently exposes individuals and places many in jeopardy.

Contrary to Daniel’s apprehensions, Assange appears dismissive, underlining his belief that his own experiences have been far more tumultuous. Tensions mount as Assange’s brusque demeanor leads to incidents like abandoning Daniel at his family’s home after accepting a dinner invitation. This only exacerbates the existing rift between them.

Throughout the narrative, flashbacks shed light on Assange’s tumultuous upbringing and his connections to a dubious cult, hinting that his fervor for WikiLeaks is intertwined with unresolved childhood trauma rather than a pure desire to better the world. Daniel starts to question whether Assange is more of a charismatic manipulator than a genuine mentor. His curiosity intensifies as he listens to the different explanations Assange provides regarding the origins of his white hair. Initially, Assange claims WikiLeaks is staffed by hundreds, yet Daniel later discovers they are essentially operating as a two-man team.

As the storyline unfolds, Assange repeatedly emphasizes the paramount importance of safeguarding their sources. But Daniel’s growing skepticism leads him to believe that Assange’s true intent is to use these sources merely to attract more whistleblowers without genuine concern for any potential harm inflicted on individuals. Assange justifies that the beneficial outcomes of their leaks outweigh the associated risks, lending to a philosophical clash with Daniel, who feels a moral obligation to safeguard those who reach out.

The situation escalates dramatically when Bradley Manning (later known as Chelsea Manning) leaks an extensive array of documents, including the infamous “Collateral Murder” video, as well as the Afghan and Iraq War Logs and 250,000 US Diplomatic Cables. Despite Assange’s eagerness to publish the documents immediately, Daniel insists on reviewing them first. Eventually, several major news outlets collaborate with WikiLeaks to disseminate the documents while portraying the organization in a positive light. However, both Daniel and the media outlets demand the redaction of names to protect the informants, a concession that Assange reluctantly agrees to.

As tensions reach a boiling point, Daniel becomes increasingly aware that Assange intends to disregard this agreement and is positioning a new confidant to take his place. The redacted documents are eventually made public, erupting in a media frenzy that forces many informants to seek refuge and prompts resignations among U.S. diplomats. In a bold move, Daniel and the original WikiLeaks team cut ties with Assange, erasing the site and blocking his access to their server.

In the aftermath, Daniel confides in a reporter from The Guardian, both expressing concern about having given Assange such immense visibility. The journalist acknowledges that while Assange’s trustworthiness is in question, his revelations about governmental and business misconduct are significant. Daniel also shares a startling tidbit about Assange’s hair color, unveiling its roots in his past association with the cult.

As the credits near, it becomes apparent that WikiLeaks continues its operations, with implications that Assange has either reclaimed control of the site or established a new one. Daniel publishes a book recounting his experiences with the organization that inspired the film, while Assange threatens legal action in response. The film concludes with Assange holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, seeking to evade arrest linked to accusations of sexual misconduct. In an interview, he decries two upcoming films about WikiLeaks, asserting that they will misrepresent the facts—something he attributes to the narratives drawn from Daniel’s book—and reflects bitterly that hiring Daniel was a significant error on his part.

Timeline

Track the key events of The Fifth Estate (2013) with a comprehensive timeline. Perfect for understanding the sequence of major plot points, this feature offers clarity on how the story unfolds.


Initial Meeting

In 2007, Daniel Domscheit-Berg meets Julian Assange for the first time at the Chaos Communication Congress in Berlin. This meeting marks the beginning of their partnership centered around their shared vision for WikiLeaks and online activism.

2007 Berlin

Formation of WikiLeaks

After corresponding over email, Daniel expresses his eagerness to collaborate with Assange on WikiLeaks. This platform aims to expose classified information while protecting the identities of whistleblowers, signifying a new era of transparency.

First Major Target

Their first significant project involves investigating the Swiss bank Julius Baer, which is implicated in illicit activities through its Cayman Islands branch. Despite legal actions taken by Baer to shut them down, a judge ultimately lifts the restrictions, allowing them to reclaim the domain name.

Cayman Islands

Publishing Sensitive Information

Over the following years, Daniel and Assange publish various sensitive leaks, including details about Scientology and Sarah Palin's email account. Daniel feels a sense of purpose, believing they are engaged in a noble fight for transparency.

Strained Partnership

As their operations expand, the relationship between Daniel and Assange begins to deteriorate. Personal and professional setbacks affect Daniel, who ultimately loses his job while Assange remains focused on the mission, leading to increasing tension.

Assange's Dismissive Attitude

Assange's brusque demeanor further strains their partnership. Incidents such as abandoning Daniel at a family dinner amplify existing rifts, causing Daniel to question Assange's true character and motivations.

Family Home

Uncovering Assange's Past

Flashbacks reveal Assange's troubled childhood and ties to a dubious cult. These insights lead Daniel to speculate whether Assange’s passion for WikiLeaks stems from unresolved trauma rather than altruism.

Document Leaks by Chelsea Manning

The situation escalates dramatically when Bradley Manning leaks a trove of documents, including the notorious 'Collateral Murder' video and millions of classified cables. Daniel insists on reviewing the documents before publication to ensure the safety of informants.

Media Collaboration

Major news outlets collaborate with WikiLeaks to distribute the leaked documents while portraying the organization positively. Meanwhile, both Daniel and the media pressure Assange to redact names to protect sources, an agreement he hesitates to honor.

Breaking Ties with Assange

As tensions peak, Daniel realizes Assange plans to disregard their agreement on document redaction. In a decisive move, he and the original WikiLeaks team cut ties with Assange, effectively erasing the site and blocking him from their server.

Confiding in The Guardian

After severing ties with Assange, Daniel confides in a reporter from The Guardian about the consequences of their partnership. He expresses concern over granting Assange excessive visibility, complicating the narrative around their disclosures.

Daniel's Book Publication

In the aftermath of his experiences with Assange, Daniel publishes a book detailing his time at WikiLeaks. This leads to tensions as Assange threatens legal action, asserting that the book misrepresents the facts.

Assange's Refuge

The film concludes with Assange seeking refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid arrest over sexual misconduct allegations. He uses an interview to criticize upcoming films about WikiLeaks and reflects on his partnership with Daniel.

Ecuadorian embassy, London

WikiLeaks Continues Operations

In the final moments, it’s revealed that WikiLeaks continues to operate, with hints that Assange may have regained control of the platform or established a new one after parting ways with Daniel. This suggests that the legacy of their work still impacts the world.

Characters

Meet the characters that bring The Fifth Estate (2013) to life. Dive into detailed profiles of the cast and their roles, exploring their motivations, relationships, and arcs within the story.


Daniel Domscheit-Berg (Daniel Brühl)

Daniel is portrayed as a passionate and idealistic journalist whose collaboration with Assange initially fills him with purpose. However, as the story unfolds, he grapples with moral dilemmas and growing disillusionment towards Assange's methods and motivations.

📰 Journalist 🤔 Idealist ⚖️ Ethical Dilemma

Julian Assange

Assange is depicted as a controversial yet magnetic figure whose charismatic approach masks a complex and troubled past. His unwavering belief in the importance of transparency often puts him at odds with Daniel as he prioritizes ambition over ethical concerns.

💼 Activist 🎭 Charismatic 🔒 Secretive

Setting

Uncover the settings of The Fifth Estate (2013), from iconic locations to the time period that shapes its world. See how these elements add depth and context to the movie’s narrative.


Time period

2007-2010

The events unfold between 2007 and 2010, a period characterized by rapid developments in technology and information sharing. This era saw the rise of online activism, alongside significant political events, including the initial leaks from WikiLeaks which challenged traditional media narratives.

Location

Berlin, Ecuadorian embassy in London

The story prominently features Berlin, known for its vibrant history and culture, where pivotal meetings between key characters occur at the Chaos Communication Congress. The film also concludes in an Ecuadorian embassy in London, a place synonymous with political asylum and secrecy, highlighting the stakes involved in Assange's situation.

🏙️ City 🏛️ Embassy

Themes

Explore the core themes of The Fifth Estate (2013). From its commentary on social issues to its emotional undertones, delve into the deeper messages woven into the film’s story.


🤝

Trust and Betrayal

The film explores the dynamics of trust, particularly between Assange and Domscheit-Berg. As their relationship deteriorates, the themes of betrayal and moral conflict intensify, reflecting the complexities of loyalty when ideals clash with personal ethics.

💻

Digital Activism

At its core, the movie examines the implications of digital activism, showcasing how platforms like WikiLeaks can empower whistleblowers but also create potential dangers for innocent parties. It raises questions about the balance between transparency and the protection of individuals' identities.

⚖️

Ethics

A significant theme is the ethical responsibility tied to leaking information. The narrative pits the promise of revealing the truth against the ethical duty to protect those implicated, highlighting the moral dilemmas faced by activists in a digital age.

© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.