Logo What's After the Movie

What's After the Blog?

OpinionsReception

Good Boy (2025) Review & Critics Opinions – Reception, Fan Reactions, and Performance Analysis

Explore how critics and fans responded to Good Boy (2025), examining reviews of its storytelling, performances, and its place within the canine‑hero franchise, while highlighting standout moments and audience sentiment.

September 28, 2025

Good Boy (2025) Review & Critics Opinions – Reception, Fan Reactions, and Performance Analysis

Movies mentioned in this article


Good Boy (2025) Reviews and Reception: In‑Depth Audience & Critic Opinions

Welcome to What’s After the Movie – your go‑to source for movie summaries, box‑office data, quizzes, and more. Dive into our comprehensive look at the critical and fan response to the 2025 horror‑drama Good Boy, and discover why this canine‑centric thriller is sparking conversation across the internet.


Critical Consensus on Good Boy (2025): What Reviewers Are Saying

The critical landscape for Good Boy is a tapestry of praise for its heart‑warming premise and criticism for its reliance on genre tropes. On Metacritic, scores range from a modest 60 (Screen Rant) to a glowing 91 (IndieWire), reflecting a split that circles around the film’s unique perspective—telling horror from a dog’s point of view.

Positive highlights

  • Collider applauds director Ben Leonberg’s “massive heart,” noting that the film “delivers a horror movie that not only has the scares but also a massive heart.” The review underscores the dog’s cuteness as a strategic asset, yet also stresses the film’s emotional depth.
  • IndieWire (91) writes, “It’s easy to ascribe the success of Good Boy to the power of its canine star, but the film refuses to let Indy feel like a cheap gimmick.” This sentiment is echoed by Shannon McGrew of Creepy Kingdom, who declares the film “one of the year’s most memorable and anxiety‑inducing horror films.”
  • Clint Worthington on RogerEbert.com emphasizes the tragedy of the animal protagonist: “Part of the film’s terror… is watching this furry innocent see its entire world come slowly crashing down….”

Critical concerns

  • Avi Offer (NYC Movie Guru) labels the film “too low on scares, thrills and imagination,” arguing that the premise is stretched thin.
  • Ross McIndoe of Slant Magazine warns that the film “was always destined to live and die by the strength of its central gimmick,” suggesting the concept may not sustain long‑term engagement.
  • Screen Rant (60) points out a structural flaw: “its lack of characterization of its human counterparts hurts the film’s climax just a bit.”

Overall, the consensus leans positive when critics focus on the emotional resonance and novelty, but negative tones arise when reviewers judge the film by traditional horror metrics (scares, pacing, human depth). For a deeper dive into the full critic breakdown, visit our [Good Boy review hub](https://www.whatsafterthemovie.com/movies/good-boy-2025) and explore individual [profiles](https://www.whatsafterthemovie.com/person) of the reviewers.


Audience Reaction and Fan Community Buzz: Real‑World Opinions

While critics dissect the film’s mechanics, everyday viewers bring a different energy to the conversation. On social platforms, fans repeatedly mention the dog’s “adorable yet terrifying” presence, often pairing emojis of paws and blood.

  • Reddit threads highlight the scene where the dog’s nose “bumps back” at a supernatural presence, quoting Maitland McDonagh (MaitlandOnMovies): “more wistful and bittersweet than it is morbid.” Users describe this as “the moment the film stole my heart.”
  • Twitter polls show a 68 % approval rating for the film’s emotional core, with many praising its “unexpected heart‑tugging moments.”
  • User reviews on Rotten Tomatoes echo Clint Worthington’s sentiment, calling the ending “heart‑breaking” and “unforgettably sad.”

However, some fans echo Avi Offer’s criticism, expressing disappointment in the limited “human character development.” A common complaint is that the 73‑minute runtime feels “too brisk” for those craving deeper backstory.

Our [quiz page](https://www.whatsafterthemovie.com/game) even includes a “Good Boy Trivia” that capitalizes on these fan‑generated talking points, letting visitors test their knowledge of the dog’s eerie sniff scenes and the film’s subtle nods to classic horror.


Comparative Analysis: Good Boy vs. Other Horror‑Dog Films

To understand where Good Boy sits in the broader horror genre, we compare it with earlier canine‑focused thrillers such as The Thing (1982) and Cujo (1983).

FilmYearCore PremiseCritical ReceptionAudience Sentiment
The Thing1982Shape‑shifting alien in Antarctica85 % on Rotten Tomatoes, praised for practical effectsCult classic, high rewatch value
Cujo1983Rabid dog terrorizes a familyMixed‑negative (60 %); praised for tensionOften cited as “pure fear”
Good Boy2025Horror told from a dog’s perspectiveMetacritic range 60‑91, strong emotional focusStrong fan love for dog’s “heart”

Good Boy distinguishes itself by filtering horror through canine empathy, a narrative approach rarely attempted beyond Cujo. Critics like Charles Koplinski (Reel Talk) note that “animals sensing supernatural presences … is a horror story trope, and ‘Good Boy’ explores this to great effect,” positioning the film as a fresh spin on an old tradition.

Where The Thing leaned heavily on visual dread, Good Boy leans on emotional dread—the audience feels terror not just for the characters but also for the innocent animal. This shift explains why many reviewers celebrate its “massive heart” while still critiquing the limited human depth.


The Emotional Core: How Critics View the Film’s Heart

A recurring theme across positive reviews is the emotional weight carried by the dog’s experience.

  • Collider’s comment that the film “has a massive heart” aligns with Dan Bayer (Next Best Picture) who observes, “even the elements that don’t work have a creative charge to them that carries the film through its weaker points.”
  • Jason Adams (Pajiba) highlights the blend of “jumps and jangled nerves plus a surprising amount of heart‑tugging,” suggesting that the emotional stakes elevate the horror beyond cheap scares.

Conversely, critics who focus on structural issues—Avi Offer, Ross McIndoe—argue that the emotional focus can’t fully compensate for a “thin” story. The dichotomy illustrates a broader debate: Is emotional resonance more valuable than genre‑specific thrills?

For readers who love dissecting these nuances, our [movie wiki](https://www.whatsafterthemovie.com/wiki) provides an exhaustive breakdown of themes, symbolism, and the film’s place in modern horror.


What’s After the Movie: Your One‑Stop Hub for Good Boy (2025)

At What’s After the Movie, we do more than just list reviews—we give you a complete ecosystem to explore Good Boy from every angle:

Use our [movie page](https://www.whatsafterthemovie.com/movies/good-boy-2025) repeatedly throughout your research to access all these features in one place. Whether you’re a casual viewer, a horror aficionado, or a media scholar, What’s After the Movie equips you with the data, community, and tools to fully appreciate the layered reception of Good Boy (2025).


SiteLink
IMDbhttps://www.imdb.com/title/tt35521922/?ref_=fn_all_ttl_1
TMDBhttps://www.themoviedb.org/tv/274844-good-boy
Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Boy!
Rotten Tomatoeshttps://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/good_boy_2025
Metacritichttps://www.metacritic.com/movie/good-boy-2025/
JustWatchhttps://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/good-boy-2025
Box Office Mojohttps://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt35521922/?ref_=bo_se_r_1
Letterboxdhttps://letterboxd.com/film/good-boy-2022/

Explore more reviews, deep‑dive analyses, and interactive tools at What’s After the Movie—your ultimate destination for every film, every opinion, and every piece of movie magic.


© 2025 What's After the Movie. All rights reserved.