On the Basis of Sex 2018

As a determined new mom, Ruth Bader Ginsburg defies convention, persevering through personal and professional challenges as she pioneers a landmark legal battle against gender bias. With her husband Martin by her side, Ruth tackles a groundbreaking tax case that could reshape the judicial landscape and cement her place in history.

As a determined new mom, Ruth Bader Ginsburg defies convention, persevering through personal and professional challenges as she pioneers a landmark legal battle against gender bias. With her husband Martin by her side, Ruth tackles a groundbreaking tax case that could reshape the judicial landscape and cement her place in history.

Does On the Basis of Sex have end credit scenes?

No!

On the Basis of Sex does not have end credit scenes.

Ratings


Metacritic

59

Metascore

6.7

User Score

Rotten Tomatoes
review

%

TOMATOMETER

review

0%

User Score

IMDb

7.1 /10

IMDb Rating

Movie Quiz


On the Basis of Sex Quiz: Test your knowledge about the inspiring journey of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her fight for gender equality.

What year did Ruth Bader Ginsburg attend Harvard Law School?

Plot Summary

See more

In 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, portrayed by Felicity Jones, embarks on her first year at Harvard Law School. While she diligently attends her own classes, she also takes on the responsibility of attending her husband Martin’s lectures, played by Armie Hammer, who is in his second year but has fallen ill due to cancer. Amidst her academic pursuits and caring for their infant daughter Jane, represented by Cailee Spaeny, Ruth shows remarkable resilience.

As the years pass, Martin’s cancer goes into remission, leading him to accept a position at a prominent firm in New York. However, Ruth faces an obstacle when she petitions Dean Griswold, a character portrayed by Sam Waterston, at Harvard to allow her to complete her law degree at Columbia Law School. To her dismay, he adheres strictly to university policies, prompting Ruth to transfer to Columbia instead. Even with her stellar academic performance, she struggles to secure a position at a law firm due to the prevalent gender biases of the era. Ultimately, she takes on a teaching role at Rutgers Law School, focusing on “Sex Discrimination and the Law.”

In 1970, Martin introduces Ruth to a pivotal case: Moritz v. Commissioner, concerning Charles Moritz, portrayed by Chris Mulkey. Moritz, a man who employed a nurse for his aging mother, finds himself denied a tax deduction that was unfairly awarded only to specific categories including women. Ruth seizes this moment to challenge gender discrimination through the legal system, believing that by setting a precedent for a man discriminated against, she can pave the way for future cases affecting women.

Determined, Ruth approaches Mel Wulf from the ACLU for assistance, but he initially declines. After some persuasion from activist Dorothy Kenyon, who transforms from skepticism to support, Ruth inspires Wulf to come on board. She then travels to Denver to meet Moritz, who agrees to allow Ruth and the ACLU to represent him pro bono, understanding the far-reaching implications of their case.

As the legal battle escalates, James H. Bozarth, portrayed by Jack Reynor, steps forward to lead the defense. He meticulously researches gender-related sections of the US Code, presenting a strong argument against the constitutionality of the existing law. Meanwhile, Ruth, lacking courtroom experience, grapples with anxiety during practice sessions. With Wulf’s encouragement, Martin takes the lead in the courtroom, while Ruth argues the equal protection aspects.

Amidst the proceedings, the government presents a meager settlement of one dollar to Moritz, which Ruth counters with a more substantial proposal: acknowledgment of the deduction claim with a declaration about the unconstitutional nature of the gender restrictions. Faced with refusals from the government, the case proceeds to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

During the oral arguments, Martin inadvertently allocates more time than planned to their position. Nervous yet determined, Ruth utilizes her rebuttal with clarity and conviction, arguing for the urgency to evolve laws alongside societal changes. She asserts, > “Societal roles that existed one hundred years ago, or even twenty years ago, no longer apply.” When challenged regarding the Constitution’s silence on “woman,” she boldly retorts that it also lacks the term “freedom.”

As they await the court’s decision, Ruth, the Ginsburgs, and Wulf share a moment of celebration, recognizing her transformative growth as a lawyer. The narrative concludes with triumphant titles revealing the Court of Appeals’ unanimous ruling in favor of Moritz. Ruth’s groundbreaking work leads to the co-founding of the Women’s Rights Project at the ACLU, dismantling numerous discriminatory laws, and in 1993, she is voted into an associate justice position on the U.S. Supreme Court. The film closes with the real Ruth Bader Ginsburg ascending the steps of the Supreme Court building, symbolizing her legacy in the fight for justice and equality.

© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.