On the Basis of Sex

On the Basis of Sex 2018

Test your knowledge of On the Basis of Sex with our quiz!

Plot Summary


In 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, portrayed by Felicity Jones, embarks on her first year at Harvard Law School. While she diligently attends her own classes, she also takes on the responsibility of attending her husband Martin’s lectures, played by Armie Hammer, who is in his second year but has fallen ill due to cancer. Amidst her academic pursuits and caring for their infant daughter Jane, represented by Cailee Spaeny, Ruth shows remarkable resilience.

As the years pass, Martin’s cancer goes into remission, leading him to accept a position at a prominent firm in New York. However, Ruth faces an obstacle when she petitions Dean Griswold, a character portrayed by Sam Waterston, at Harvard to allow her to complete her law degree at Columbia Law School. To her dismay, he adheres strictly to university policies, prompting Ruth to transfer to Columbia instead. Even with her stellar academic performance, she struggles to secure a position at a law firm due to the prevalent gender biases of the era. Ultimately, she takes on a teaching role at Rutgers Law School, focusing on “Sex Discrimination and the Law.”

In 1970, Martin introduces Ruth to a pivotal case: Moritz v. Commissioner, concerning Charles Moritz, portrayed by Chris Mulkey. Moritz, a man who employed a nurse for his aging mother, finds himself denied a tax deduction that was unfairly awarded only to specific categories including women. Ruth seizes this moment to challenge gender discrimination through the legal system, believing that by setting a precedent for a man discriminated against, she can pave the way for future cases affecting women.

Determined, Ruth approaches Mel Wulf from the ACLU for assistance, but he initially declines. After some persuasion from activist Dorothy Kenyon, who transforms from skepticism to support, Ruth inspires Wulf to come on board. She then travels to Denver to meet Moritz, who agrees to allow Ruth and the ACLU to represent him pro bono, understanding the far-reaching implications of their case.

As the legal battle escalates, James H. Bozarth, portrayed by Jack Reynor, steps forward to lead the defense. He meticulously researches gender-related sections of the US Code, presenting a strong argument against the constitutionality of the existing law. Meanwhile, Ruth, lacking courtroom experience, grapples with anxiety during practice sessions. With Wulf’s encouragement, Martin takes the lead in the courtroom, while Ruth argues the equal protection aspects.

Amidst the proceedings, the government presents a meager settlement of one dollar to Moritz, which Ruth counters with a more substantial proposal: acknowledgment of the deduction claim with a declaration about the unconstitutional nature of the gender restrictions. Faced with refusals from the government, the case proceeds to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

During the oral arguments, Martin inadvertently allocates more time than planned to their position. Nervous yet determined, Ruth utilizes her rebuttal with clarity and conviction, arguing for the urgency to evolve laws alongside societal changes. She asserts, > “Societal roles that existed one hundred years ago, or even twenty years ago, no longer apply.” When challenged regarding the Constitution’s silence on “woman,” she boldly retorts that it also lacks the term “freedom.”

As they await the court’s decision, Ruth, the Ginsburgs, and Wulf share a moment of celebration, recognizing her transformative growth as a lawyer. The narrative concludes with triumphant titles revealing the Court of Appeals’ unanimous ruling in favor of Moritz. Ruth’s groundbreaking work leads to the co-founding of the Women’s Rights Project at the ACLU, dismantling numerous discriminatory laws, and in 1993, she is voted into an associate justice position on the U.S. Supreme Court. The film closes with the real Ruth Bader Ginsburg ascending the steps of the Supreme Court building, symbolizing her legacy in the fight for justice and equality.

Timeline


Ruth's Journey Begins

In 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg embarks on her academic journey as she starts her first year at Harvard Law School. Despite the challenges ahead, she is determined to succeed while also managing her family responsibilities, highlighting her remarkable resilience.

1956 Harvard Law School

Caring for Martin

During her first year, Ruth also takes on the responsibility of attending her husband Martin's lectures as he battles cancer. This dual commitment showcases Ruth's dedication to her family while pursuing her education.

Martin's Cancer Remission

As the years progress, Martin’s health improves and his cancer goes into remission. This recovery allows him to accept a promising position at a prestigious law firm in New York, shifting their family dynamics and aspirations.

New York

Transferring to Columbia

Facing obstacles at Harvard, Ruth petitions Dean Griswold to complete her law degree at Columbia Law School. After being denied, she makes the bold decision to transfer, demonstrating her determination to overcome barriers in her academic journey.

Columbia Law School

Teaching at Rutgers

Despite her stellar academic performance, Ruth struggles to find a position at a law firm due to gender biases. Ultimately, she takes on a teaching role at Rutgers Law School, focusing her efforts on educating future lawyers about sex discrimination in the law.

Rutgers Law School

Introduction to Moritz v. Commissioner

In 1970, Martin introduces Ruth to the pivotal case of Moritz v. Commissioner, where Charles Moritz is denied a tax deduction due to gender discrimination. This case serves as a catalyst for Ruth's career in fighting gender discrimination through the legal system.

1970

Seeking ACLU's Help

Determined to make a difference, Ruth approaches Mel Wulf from the ACLU for assistance with the Moritz case. Initially hesitant, Wulf's perspective changes thanks to the encouragement of activist Dorothy Kenyon, who recognizes the significance of Ruth’s mission.

Meeting with Moritz

Ruth travels to Denver to meet Charles Moritz, who agrees to let Ruth and the ACLU represent him pro bono. This agreement marks a significant step in their legal battle against gender discrimination, with implications that extend beyond their individual case.

Denver

Preparations for Court

As the legal battle intensifies, James H. Bozarth leads the defense against the existing law. Meanwhile, Ruth, grappling with her courtroom inexperience, struggles with anxiety during practice, but receives crucial support from her husband Martin.

Courtroom Dynamics

During the court proceedings, Martin takes the lead while Ruth focuses on the equal protection arguments. Their collaboration exemplifies their partnership and commitment to challenging the legal norms of gender discrimination.

Government's Offer

Facing a meager settlement of one dollar from the government, Ruth counters with a proposal for recognition of Moritz's deduction claim alongside a declaration about the unconstitutionality of restrictive gender clauses. This moment emphasizes her determination to challenge unjust laws.

The Appeal Process

The case proceeds to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals after the government rejects Ruth's counter. As they await the court's decision, tensions rise as the stakes of the case become clear for both genders and future legal practices.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Ruth's Rebuttal

During oral arguments, Ruth makes a compelling rebuttal that articulates the need for laws to evolve with society. Her assertion that traditional gender roles should not dictate legal recognition highlights her forward-thinking approach.

Celebration of Victory

Following the court's unanimous ruling in favor of Moritz, Ruth, her family, and Wulf celebrate a significant victory in the fight against gender discrimination. This landmark case sets a precedent for future challenges against discriminatory laws.

Ruth's Supreme Court Appointment

In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg is appointed as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Her journey from a law student to the highest court in the nation symbolizes her profound impact on gender equality and justice in America.

1993 U.S. Supreme Court

Characters


Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ruth is a determined and intelligent law student who becomes a trailblazer for women's rights. Her journey is marked by resilience as she faces societal and institutional barriers. Ruth's advocacy and legal acumen reveal her dedication to justice, and she emerges as a pivotal figure in the fight against gender discrimination.

👩‍⚖️ Lawyer ✊ Activist 📚 Scholar

Martin Ginsburg

Martin is Ruth's supportive husband, portrayed as compassionate and steadfast. His illness adds a layer of complexity to Ruth's struggles, but he encourages her in her legal pursuits. Despite his health setbacks, Martin plays a significant role in Ruth's journey, demonstrating love and partnership throughout their marriage.

💗 Supportive 👫 Partner

Mel Wulf

Mel is a pivotal character who initially lacks confidence in the case Ruth presents but is ultimately inspired by her passion. His journey reflects the importance of allies in the fight for justice as he becomes a key figure in the legal battle against discrimination. Mel's transformation showcases the impact of advocacy and collaboration.

🤝 Ally ⚖️ Legal Advocate

Dorothy Kenyon

Dorothy is a seasoned activist who represents the voice of experience and skepticism initially, but her eventual support demonstrates the strength of solidarity. She embodies the transformative power of encouragement, becoming an ally for Ruth in a critical moment of the film.

👵 Activist 💪 Supporter

Charles Moritz

Charles is a man facing gender discrimination in the legal system, representing the case that Ruth takes on. His character illustrates how gender biases can also affect men and serves as a crucial element in Ruth's legal strategy to challenge societal norms. Charles's willingness to fight for his rights aids in paving the way for women's rights.

👨‍⚖️ Plaintiff ⚖️ Discriminated

Setting


Time period

1956-1993

The film spans several decades, beginning in 1956 when Ruth Bader Ginsburg enrolls at Harvard Law School and addressing the struggles women faced in a male-dominated legal field. It highlights the societal and legal shifts through the 1970s, culminating in Ruth's appointment as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993. This era is marked by significant legal reforms focused on gender equality.

Location

Harvard Law School, Columbia Law School, New York, Denver, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Supreme Court

The movie takes place primarily at renowned institutions like Harvard Law School and Columbia Law School, which are known for their rigorous legal education. Key locations also include New York, where Ruth navigates the corporate law environment, and Denver, where pivotal meetings occur. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals serves as a significant battleground for Ruth's landmark case, culminating in a celebration at the Supreme Court.

🏛️ Education ⚖️ Justice

Themes


⚖️

Gender Equality

A central theme of the film is the pursuit of gender equality through the legal system. Ruth Bader Ginsburg's journey illustrates the systemic discrimination women faced and her determination to dismantle these barriers. The film highlights her groundbreaking legal arguments that challenge the status quo, significantly contributing to the advancement of women's rights.

💪

Resilience

Ruth's character exemplifies resilience as she navigates the challenges of being a woman in law during the 1950s and 1970s. Her ability to balance academia, family, and a burgeoning legal career showcases her unwavering commitment to justice. The film portrays her strength in the face of adversity, inspiring others to fight for what is right.

© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.