The Third Murder 2018

In this gripping drama, renowned attorney Shigemori's world is turned upside down by a seemingly open-and-shut case. As he defends accused murderer Misumi, who freely confesses to the crime, Shigemori's confidence falters as doubts creep in. The closer he gets to the truth, the more questions arise about his client's guilt, leaving the outcome of justice hanging precariously in the balance.

In this gripping drama, renowned attorney Shigemori's world is turned upside down by a seemingly open-and-shut case. As he defends accused murderer Misumi, who freely confesses to the crime, Shigemori's confidence falters as doubts creep in. The closer he gets to the truth, the more questions arise about his client's guilt, leaving the outcome of justice hanging precariously in the balance.

Does The Third Murder have end credit scenes?

No!

The Third Murder does not have end credit scenes.

Ratings


Metacritic

68

Metascore

6.4

User Score

Rotten Tomatoes
review

%

TOMATOMETER

review

0%

User Score

IMDb

6.0 /10

IMDb Rating

TMDB

66

%

User Score

Movie Quiz


The Third Murder Quiz: Test your knowledge on the complexities and twists of 'The Third Murder' with this challenging quiz.

At what time does the murder take place?

Plot Summary

See more

As the clock struck 12:30 am on October 11, 2017, a horrifying scene played out alongside the banks of the Tama River. A man’s charred remains lay in the shadows, the result of a vicious assault followed by a ruthless incineration. This dreadful incident would soon unravel into a complex and deeply unsettling murder investigation.

In the midst of this turmoil was Shigemori, a seasoned criminal defense attorney, accompanied by his loyal assistant Kawashima. Their journey commenced at the Yokohama Detention Center, where they met Misumi, the man accused of robbery and murder. Misumi’s past was ominous—he bore a previous conviction from 30 years ago when Shigemori’s own father served as the presiding judge. This judgment had spared Misumi from the death penalty, only to see him recently released.

As they dug deeper into the case, Shigemori and Kawashima encountered a labyrinth of deceptions and contradictions in Misumi’s explanations. He asserted that he had killed the former owner of a food factory in Kawasaki to settle debts, claiming influence from substances during the act. Yet, his prior attorney Settsu provided evidence indicating that Misumi had premeditated the crime long before that fateful night.

The discrepancies in Misumi’s recounting unraveled as quickly as they were formed. He spoke of returning to the factory to retrieve gasoline post-murder, even injuring his hand in the process. Amid reviewing the intricate details, Shigemori’s team saw a chance to mitigate the charges against him.

But as the investigation advanced, they stumbled upon a perplexing cross left at the crime scene, a potential signpost leading them to a teenage girl who walked with a pronounced limp. This clue piqued their interest about possible motivations and underlying connections. Further scrutiny of surveillance footage and the victim’s wallet revealed something astonishing—Misumi had stolen money after the murder, forcing Shigemori to reassess his client’s intentions, effectively challenging any arguments of theft.

A somber visit to the victim’s family, bearing a letter from Misumi, brought Shigemori into the emotional storm raging within the victim’s teenage daughter, whose limp mirrored the symbol left at the crime scene. Without forgiveness from the victim’s wife, the atmosphere was thick with grief. Meanwhile, Kawashima’s inquiries at the factory exposed strains between Misumi and his former employer regarding unpaid wages, prompting Shigemori to rethink their defense strategy, possibly pivoting the narrative towards revenge due to being wrongfully terminated.

With the case continuing to evolve, Shigemori found himself facing a moral quandary, entangled between justice and compassion. As they approached Misumi’s home again, he presented a magazine article that curiously reflected their own case—a tale of a woman who conspired to murder her husband for insurance money. The legal team speculated that Misumi was hired by the victim’s wife, only for Misumi to shockingly affirm that the wife had reached out to him two weeks before the incident, promising security should he remain silent about her involvement.

In the backdrop of their investigation, Shigemori’s father cautioned him against wasting time trying to decipher Misumi’s motivations, advising him to focus on constructing a solid legal defense. Yet, Shigemori sensed there was more at play. In search of clarity, he traveled to Rumoi, Misumi’s hometown, where memories intertwined with feelings of nostalgia emerged as he reflected on a postcard sent to his father by Misumi.

In Rumoi, encounters with the arresting officer shed light on the deeper layers of Misumi’s past crimes, questioning whether a potential coercion by his attorney had tainted the true nature of his confessions. At a local bar, inquiries about Misumi’s attempts to contact his estranged daughter Megumi led to a chilling revelation: Megumi wanted nothing to do with her father and was poised to testify against him.

Returning to Yokohama, Shigemori shared insights with Sakie, hinting at Misumi’s possible affection for her due to their shared experiences linked to Megumi’s disability. However, the discussion turned hostile when Shigemori suggested a hidden relationship between her and Misumi.

As the pivotal trial approached, Shigemori sought to delve into Misumi’s psyche, specifically regarding his alleged intentions with the wallet. Misumi agreed to deny any theft but astutely reframed the conversation, questioning the sincerity behind Shigemori’s legal tactics versus genuine beliefs in his narrative.

A profound turning point occurred when Sakie, the victim’s wife, took the stand. Her assertion that the 500,000 yen was not for greed but tied to her family’s business dealings disrupted the defense’s carefully laid groundwork. A tense confrontation with Sakie unveiled her traumatic history of abuse at the hands of her father, which she unmasked to Misumi, as Shigemori witnessed vivid dreamlike sequences connecting him with both Sakie and Misumi during the horrific act.

With the foundations of his defense collapsing, Misumi revised his story, asserting his innocence and claiming that the money was for illegal business transactions. Settsu advised him to plead guilty to evade execution, as Misumi recounted sending the stolen money to Megumi after suffering burns from a bonfire mishap. Faced with these new developments, Shigemori reluctantly accepted Misumi’s altered account.

In the final moments before the trial resumed, Shigemori confronted Sakie one last time, pleading with her not to condemn Misumi to death. Yet, when the court reconvened, Sakie expressed disbelief that Misumi killed her father for money, wanting mercy instead of retribution. Reluctantly, Misumi claimed coercion from both the prosecution and his own counsel in confessing guilt despite his protestations of innocence. The courtroom found itself on the edge of a precipice, echoing the complexities of morality and truth.

Ultimately, the judge delivered a verdict favoring the prosecution, sentencing Misumi to death. After the trial concluded, Shigemori approached Sakie once more, where she reiterated Misumi’s confounding notion that truth is subjective.

As Shigemori returned to Misumi’s modest home, he pondered over the reasons driving Misumi’s guilt—whether it was an act to shield Sakie from facing her own scars. In turn, Misumi showcased inklings of self-awareness about his existence, suggesting that even he, with his flaws, could have a positive influence on others. This conversation ignited a barrage of emotions in Shigemori, who found the scales of hope and despair precariously balanced.

As he stepped outside, pausing at an intersection, Shigemori gazed upward, encapsulated in a moment of reflection. The stillness belied the inner chaos as he grappled with the intricate nature of humanity and the fragile connections woven between them all.

© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.