Directed by
Karin Steinberger
Made by
Farbfilm-Verleih
Discover the intricate plot of Killing for Love (2017). From unexpected twists to emotional highs and lows, this detailed summary breaks down every moment to give you a deeper understanding of the film’s story.
On March 30, 1985, the brutal murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom shocked the small town of Lynchburg, Virginia. Initially investigated by local police, the case eventually drew the attention of the sheriff’s department and the FBI. Fast forward five years to June 21, 1990, when Jens Söring, the boyfriend of the Haysoms’ daughter, Elizabeth Haysom, was convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of her parents, receiving two life sentences. Concurrently, Elizabeth, deemed an “accessory before the fact,” accepted a plea deal resulting in a staggering 90-year sentence. Exclaiming, >“I’m innocent,” Söring has maintained his claim of innocence ever since.
The investigation reveals dark undercurrents—what truly unfolded that fateful night in Bedford County? A dedicated team, including Jens’s lawyers, former investigator Chuck Reid, and private investigator Dave Watson, works to reassemble the fragmented case. They seek a missing FBI profile while questions arise about nude photographs allegedly depicting child abuse, which may paint Elizabeth in a different light.
In the second episode, when the noose tightens around the couple, they attempt to escape. Arrested in London for check fraud while using false identities, Jens makes a fateful and life-altering decision: to confess to the murders to protect Elizabeth from the electric chair. He believed, being the son of a German diplomat, he would simply serve a brief stint in juvenile detention. This misguided sacrifice sets off a chain of events that would forever alter both of their lives.
As the series progresses, in episode three, Elizabeth returns to the US on August 24, 1987, to testify. Her plea of guilty evokes polarizing opinions—was she a victim of an obsessive relationship or a cunning criminal? Renowned psychiatrists diagnosed her as a borderline schizophrenic and a pathological liar while the revelation dawned on Jens that his father’s diplomatic immunity did not cover him. Facing execution, he recanted his confession.
Subsequent episodes delve deeper into the trials, capturing the tumultuous courtroom scenes where public interest peaked. In episode four, Jens and Elizabeth’s fates intertwine as her testimony builds and undermines their stories. Evaluations of competing alibis and testimony from a forensic expert raise troubling questions about evidence, including a mysterious fingerprint at the crime scene.
In the penultimate episode, belief in Jens’s innocence garners support from various advocates, notably a former state employee who reviews the case and unearths inconsistencies that could exonerate him. As investigators follow new leads, attention turns to unstudied witnesses who could change the narrative entirely.
Finally, in the conclusion, Jens regrets his fateful decisions as he continues to navigate the prison system, haunted by a life sentence imposed in 1990. Years of struggle lead to a possible transfer to Germany, tantalizingly close until a new political decision bars his release. In a twist of fate, post-investigation DNA analysis on the collected evidence reveals that 11 out of 42 samples do not belong to Jens—prompting the haunting question: could the real murderer still be lurking free?
Track the key events of Killing for Love (2017) with a comprehensive timeline. Perfect for understanding the sequence of major plot points, this feature offers clarity on how the story unfolds.
Brutal Murders of the Haysoms
On March 30, 1985, the shocking murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom sent ripples throughout the small town of Lynchburg, Virginia. The brutal nature of the crime sparked a frantic investigation by local police, igniting public fear and curiosity about the dark events surrounding the case.
Investigative Attention Grabs
As the investigation into the Haysom murders progressed, it captured the interest of the sheriff's department and eventually the FBI. The involvement of these agencies underscored the case's complexity and the troubling secrets that were sure to unfold in the coming years.
Conviction of Jens Söring
On June 21, 1990, Jens Söring, who was dating Elizabeth Haysom, was convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of her parents. He received two life sentences, marking a turning point in a case that had perplexed investigators and left the community searching for answers.
Elizabeth Haysom's Plea Deal
In a shocking development, Elizabeth Haysom entered a plea deal, being deemed an 'accessory before the fact,' and received a staggering 90-year sentence. This decision sparked debate over her role in the murders and whether she was complicit or manipulated by Jens.
Jens's Claim of Innocence
Throughout the legal turmoil, Jens Söring passionately maintained his claim of innocence, asserting that he did not commit the murders for which he was convicted. His pleas echoed through the years, raising questions about the integrity of the evidence against him.
Search for the Truth
A dedicated team, including Jens's lawyers and private investigators, dove deep into the case to reveal the truth about that fateful night. Their investigation uncovered inconsistencies and sought to piece together a fragmented narrative that had long eluded clarity.
The Escape Attempt
As the pressure mounted, Jens and Elizabeth attempted to escape law enforcement's grip. Their arrest in London for check fraud under false identities marked a critical moment in their lives, leading Jens to make a fateful confession to protect Elizabeth from possible execution.
Elizabeth's Testimony
On August 24, 1987, Elizabeth returned to the U.S. to testify about the events surrounding her parents' deaths. Her guilty plea raised polarized opinions, leaving many to wonder whether she was a victim or fully culpable in the tragic murders.
Psychiatric Evaluations
Renowned psychiatrists diagnosed Elizabeth Haysom with borderline schizophrenia and labeled her a pathological liar. These revelations shifted the focus onto her mental state, complicating the public and legal perception of her involvement in the crimes.
Jens Recants His Confession
As Jens faced the grim possibility of execution, he recanted his confession, realizing that his father's diplomatic immunity would not save him. His decision to withdraw from his admission marked a significant turn in the narrative of the case.
The Tumultuous Trial
The following trials became media spectacles, complete with contentious courtroom drama and public interest reaching a fever pitch. The intersecting testimonies and evidence introduced formidable challenges, leading to conflicting narratives about the murders.
Emergence of New Evidence
In a climactic turn, advocates for Jens Söring uncovered inconsistencies in the prosecution's case that could exonerate him. Investigators began to follow new leads, exploring new witnesses and evidence that might rewrite the story of that horrific night.
Regrets and Haunting Memories
As years passed, Jens reflected on his earlier decisions with a deep sense of regret. Struggling within the prison system, he faced relentless memories of his life sentence imposed in 1990, hoping for a chance at redemption.
The Transfer to Germany
Jens's life seemed to take a turn when prospects for a transfer to Germany appeared on the horizon. However, political decisions ultimately barred his release, deepening the sense of tragedy and loss surrounding his and Elizabeth's fates.
Haunting DNA Evidence
In a late twist of fate, post-investigation DNA analysis revealed that out of 42 collected samples, 11 did not belong to Jens Söring. This shocking development raised an unsettling question: could the true murderer still be at large, evading justice?
Meet the characters that bring Killing for Love (2017) to life. Dive into detailed profiles of the cast and their roles, exploring their motivations, relationships, and arcs within the story.
Elizabeth Haysom
Elizabeth is depicted as a complex figure, caught in a web of her own making. Initially viewed as a victim, her involvement in her parents' murder raises questions about her psyche, with diagnoses labeling her as borderline schizophrenic and a pathological liar. Her motivations and entanglements reveal a character struggling with identity and consequences.
Jens Söring
Jens is a deeply conflicted character who sacrifices his freedom for love. Initially perceived as a murderer, his journey reveals layers of complexity, guilt, and regret. His decisions, driven by a misguided sense of love and protection, challenge the viewer's perception of heroism and victimhood.
Chuck Reid
Chuck serves as a dedicated investigator seeking the truth amid a convoluted case. His role underscores the challenges faced by those trying to navigate the justice system. Committed to uncovering hidden details, Chuck's experience highlights the often fraught relationship between law enforcement and the stories of those involved.
Dave Watson
Dave is a private investigator who employs unconventional methods to dig deeper into the case. His insights and dedication illuminate the challenges faced by investigators in rectifying wrongful convictions. He represents the tireless efforts of those committed to seeking justice.
Uncover the settings of Killing for Love (2017), from iconic locations to the time period that shapes its world. See how these elements add depth and context to the movie’s narrative.
Time period
1985, 1990
The events surrounding the murders occurred in the mid-1980s leading to a trial that unfolded in 1990. This time period in America was marked by rising crime rates and increasing media attention on sensational trials, reflecting societal anxieties about justice and morality.
Location
Lynchburg, Virginia
Lynchburg is a small city in Virginia known for its rich history and picturesque landscapes. It became notable during the murder investigation of Derek and Nancy Haysom, which shocked the local community and garnered national attention. The city reflects a blend of Southern charm and complex legal narratives.
Explore the core themes of Killing for Love (2017). From its commentary on social issues to its emotional undertones, delve into the deeper messages woven into the film’s story.
🔍
Justice vs. Injustice
The quest for truth and justice is central to the narrative, exploring whether Jens Söring received a fair trial or was wrongfully convicted. The series dives into the moral complexities of the characters' choices and the judicial system's reliability, resulting in impactful debates about guilt and innocence.
💔
Love and Sacrifice
At its core, the story portrays a tragic love affair that leads to devastating consequences. Jens's decision to confess to protect Elizabeth showcases a misguided notion of love, revealing the depth of human emotion intertwined with tragic outcomes. This theme resonates throughout their tumultuous journey.
⚖️
Truth and Deception
The narrative intricately weaves together elements of deception, with characters posing as both victims and perpetrators. The psychological evaluations of Elizabeth raise questions about credibility and sanity, prompting audiences to consider the nature of truth in the story, reflecting broader themes of mental health and manipulation.
What's After the Movie?
Not sure whether to stay after the credits? Find out!
Check out our other apps:
Actors
Companies
Latest Movies
© 2024 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.