The Verdict

The Verdict 1982

Test your knowledge of The Verdict with our quiz!

Plot Summary

Discover the intricate plot of The Verdict (1982). From unexpected twists to emotional highs and lows, this detailed summary breaks down every moment to give you a deeper understanding of the film’s story.


Frank Galvin, once a promising lawyer, now finds himself entrenched in self-destructive practices as an ambulance chaser. His fortunes change when he receives a medical malpractice case from his former partner, Mickey Morrissey. This case seems foolproof: a young woman has been left in a comatose state after being anesthetized during childbirth at a Catholic hospital, only to tragically choke on her own vomit. The woman’s family hopes to secure a settlement that will assist in her ongoing care. Upon his first encounter with the victim, Galvin is deeply affected, grappling with both his emotions and the weight of the case.

As he navigates the intricacies of the trial, the Catholic diocese offers a settlement of $210,000 (an equivalent of about $675,000 today), which Galvin surprisingly turns down, opting instead to take the fight to court. This shocking move leaves everyone—both opposing counsel and the judge—taken aback. Amid his chaotic preparations, he meets Laura Fischer at a local bar, where an intimate bond begins to form.

However, Galvin’s journey is far from smooth. The opposing lawyer, Ed Concannon, leads a formidable legal team adept at swaying public sentiment. Tensions escalate when the comatose woman’s brother-in-law confronts Galvin with wrath after discovering the rejected settlement offer. Matters grow worse as Galvin’s medical expert mysteriously vanishes, leaving him to grapple with a last-minute replacement whose credentials are dubious at best. Compounding the challenges is a lack of willing testimonies from operating room staff, all reluctant to admit that any negligence took place.

As the trial unfolds, Judge Hoyle confronts Galvin, threatening disbarment in a private meeting. Galvin retorts by branding the judge as merely a puppet of the local political elite, one who was unsuccessful in practicing law himself. Undaunted, Hoyle refuses to grant Galvin’s mistrial request, issuing a warning about potential arrest. Fueled by frustration, Galvin storms from the courtroom, grappling with the mounting pressures.

Determined to pursue justice, he becomes fixated on Kaitlin Costello, an admitting nurse, after a seemingly innocuous question on her report catches his eye: “When did you last eat?” This curiosity leads him and Morrissey down an unexpected path, revealing that Kaitlin has transitioned to being a preschool teacher in New York City. However, just when Galvin’s hopes begin to rise, Morrissey discovers that she is receiving payment from Concannon for inside information, a betrayal that shatters trust and culminates in an altercation between Galvin and Laura at a bar.

As the courtroom exchanges intensify, Morrissey suggests filing for a mistrial due to Concannon’s ethical breach, but Galvin opts to continue the fight. When Kaitlin finally takes the stand, her testimony contradicts the patient record, stating the nine-hour gap since the last meal before admission. Concannon’s incredulity is palpable as he questions the validity of her claims. In a dramatic turn, Kaitlin discloses that she had made a photocopy of the initial record just hours before being coerced to modify it by higher-ups, who threatened her job if she did not comply. Although Concannon raises objections citing the original record as authoritative, Hoyle permits Kaitlin to continue her testimony.

The courtroom is rocked when Kaitlin exposes that the anesthesiologist had admitted to neglecting the patient’s notes, opting to administer general anesthesia despite the woman having eaten shortly before the procedure. This critical error resulted in the woman’s tragic choking incident, which only became evident to the anesthesiologist once he recognized the catastrophe he had caused. Under duress from his superiors, he had threatened Kaitlin into fabricating the records.

After Kaitlin’s dismissal, Concannon repeats his objections based on the original hospital records. Hoyle concurs and removes Kaitlin’s testimony from the proceedings, leaving the plaintiff’s case in disarray. As the courtroom empties, a diocesan lawyer praises Concannon’s performance to a bishop, who appears skeptical about the complete validity of Kaitlin’s account.

Despite the odds stacked against him, Galvin delivers a heartfelt closing statement, pouring every ounce of effort into the performance for his clients. In a surprising verdict, the jury rules in favor of the plaintiffs, and the foreman inquires about the possibility of awarding additional compensation beyond what had been asked.

As he leaves the courtroom feeling triumphant, Galvin catches a glimpse of Laura across the atrium, her gaze filled with a blend of admiration and yearning. That evening, while she enjoys whiskey in her office, an unexpected distraction causes her to spill her drink as she anxiously retrieves her phone. Filled with urgency, she dials Galvin’s office, but her call goes unanswered, leaving her alone with her thoughts.

Timeline

Track the key events of The Verdict (1982) with a comprehensive timeline. Perfect for understanding the sequence of major plot points, this feature offers clarity on how the story unfolds.


Frank's Downfall

Frank Galvin, once a promising lawyer, spirals into a life of self-destruction, now earning a living as an ambulance chaser. His reputation has faded, leaving him entrenched in a cycle of poor decisions and questionable ethics.

The Medical Malpractice Case

Galvin receives a groundbreaking medical malpractice case from his former partner, Mickey Morrissey. The case involves a young woman who has been left comatose after childbirth due to negligence, and her family hopes to secure a settlement to aid in her ongoing care.

Catholic hospital

First Encounter with the Victim

During his first meeting with the comatose woman's family, Galvin is deeply affected by the gravity of their situation. He begins to grapple with his emotions, realizing the weight of the case and its implications for the victim's family.

Settlement Offer Rejected

The Catholic diocese offers Galvin a settlement of $210,000, which he unexpectedly declines. This shocking move stuns opposing counsel and the judge, as Galvin decides to take the fight back to court instead.

Meeting Laura Fischer

Amid the chaos of trial preparations, Galvin encounters Laura Fischer at a local bar. An intimate bond begins to form between them, providing a glimpse of hope in his tumultuous life.

Local bar

Confrontation with the Victim's Family

The trial takes a heated turn when the comatose woman’s brother-in-law accuses Galvin of mishandling the case after learning about the rejected settlement. This confrontation adds to the growing tension and pressure surrounding Galvin's quest for justice.

The Vanishing Expert

Just as the trial begins, Galvin's medical expert mysteriously disappears, compelling him to scramble for a last-minute replacement. The new expert’s credentials raise doubts, further complicating Galvin's case.

Judicial Threats

In a private meeting, Judge Hoyle threatens Galvin with disbarment, trying to assert his authority over the chaotic courtroom. Galvin staunchly defends himself, accusing the judge of being a mere puppet for local political interests.

Judge's chamber

The Nurse's Revelation

Galvin’s instincts lead him to Kaitlin Costello, an admitting nurse, after he notices an intriguing question on her report. This leads him to uncover information that could shift the case's outcome, revealing her previous position that contradicts the hospital's account.

Betrayal and Conflict

Galvin's trust is shattered when he learns that Kaitlin is receiving payment from opposing counsel for insider information. This revelation leads to a heated argument with Laura, further complicating Galvin's personal and professional life.

Local bar

Kaitlin Testifies

Kaitlin finally takes the stand to testify but her account contradicts the patient's records. She reveals a crucial nine-hour gap since the last meal before admission, causing an uproar in the courtroom and igniting conciliatory arguments from Concannon.

Courtroom

The Anesthesiologist's Admission

The tense atmosphere reaches a boiling point when Kaitlin discloses that the anesthesiologist neglected important notes about the patient’s condition, leading to the negligence that resulted in her choking incident. This news sends shockwaves through the courtroom.

Courtroom

Kaitlin's Dismissal

After revealing critical information, Kaitlin's testimony is dismissed by Judge Hoyle, much to Galvin's dismay. This leaves Galvin's case faltering under the weight of opposing counsel's objections and the loss of vital evidence.

Courtroom

A Passionate Closing Statement

Despite the setbacks, Galvin delivers a heartfelt closing argument that encapsulates his dedication to the plaintiff’s family. He fervently pleads for justice, pouring every bit of his passion into the performance.

Courtroom

Victorious Verdict

In a surprising turn of events, the jury rules in favor of the plaintiff, elevating Galvin's spirits and restoring some of his lost honor. As he leaves the courtroom, he catches a meaningful glance from Laura, hinting at unresolved feelings.

Courtroom

Characters

Meet the characters that bring The Verdict (1982) to life. Dive into detailed profiles of the cast and their roles, exploring their motivations, relationships, and arcs within the story.


Frank Galvin (Paul Newman)

Frank Galvin is a once-promising lawyer whose career has fallen into disarray due to his self-destructive behavior. Throughout the movie, he grapples with his professional decline while striving to reclaim his integrity by fighting for justice in a challenging medical malpractice case. His determination and emotional depth make him a compelling character as he navigates the treacherous waters of the legal system.

👨‍⚖️ Lawyer 🎭 Redemption

Ed Concannon (James Mason)

Ed Concannon is the formidable opposing lawyer representing the Catholic hospital. He is characterized by his strategic skill and ability to manipulate public sentiment in his favor. Concannon's confidence and ethical ambiguity create a significant obstacle for Galvin as he ultimately represents an institution steeped in power and influence.

💼 Lawyer 🎭 Antagonist

Laura Fischer (Charlotte Rampling)

Laura Fischer is a bartender who forms an intimate connection with Frank Galvin. Representing both his emotional refuge and a source of conflict, Laura's character adds depth to Galvin's personal journey. Her actions and feelings reflect the complexities of love and loyalty amid the backdrop of the courtroom drama.

🥃 Bartender ❤️ Love Interest

Kaitlin Costello (Lindsay Crouse)

Kaitlin Costello is an admitting nurse whose testimony becomes pivotal in the trial. Her character embodies the struggles of navigating professional ethics and personal integrity, especially when faced with coercion by superiors. Kaitlin's courage to stand against the hospital's malpractice highlights the theme of truth amidst pressure.

👩‍⚕️ Nurse 🔍 Truth

Setting

Uncover the settings of The Verdict (1982), from iconic locations to the time period that shapes its world. See how these elements add depth and context to the movie’s narrative.


Time period

1980s

The movie is set in the 1980s, a decade marked by significant changes in both legal practices and societal views on ethics in healthcare. During this period, there was a growing awareness of patient rights and the accountability of medical professionals, which is pivotal to the film's central narrative. This era also saw a shift in the portrayal of legal battles as a fierce contest of morals and justice.

Location

Catholic hospital, New York City

The primary setting of the movie is a Catholic hospital, known for its historical significance and the nuanced moral dilemmas it presents. The unfolding drama highlights legal and ethical complexities within the medical field. New York City serves as a backdrop for the personal interactions, embodying a place of ambition and connection amidst professional chaos.

🏥 Hospital 🗽 City

Themes

Explore the core themes of The Verdict (1982). From its commentary on social issues to its emotional undertones, delve into the deeper messages woven into the film’s story.


⚖️

Justice

The theme of justice is central to the film, exploring the complexities involved in seeking accountability for negligence in the medical field. Galvin's pursuit of justice reflects a broader societal struggle between individual rights and institutional power. The film also challenges viewers to consider the moral implications of legal decisions.

💔

Personal Redemption

Frank Galvin's journey is emblematic of personal redemption, as he seeks to right his past wrongs and find purpose in his life. His emotional turmoil and determination evolve throughout the trial, representing a quest for self-worth tied to the defense of a vulnerable patient. Ultimately, it underscores the transformative power of standing up for what one believes in.

🤝

Trust Betrayal

The theme of trust betrayal is explored through Galvin's relationships, notably with Kaitlin and his former partner. The revelation of deceit within the legal system and personal connections illustrates the fragile nature of trust, especially in high-stakes environments. This betrayal significantly impacts Galvin's strategies and emotional well-being.

© 2025 What's After the Movie?. All rights reserved.